Netflix and Reed Hastings: Who Are They Serving?

Who Are They Serving?

Netflix made big news in recent months. Overnight, the plucky consumer technology dragon-slayer transformed itself into a villain.

Facing the very real transition from mail-in dvd’s to digital streaming, Netflix took a wrong turn.  The company suddenly, dramatically increased prices on mail-in discs. They appeared determined to shift existing customers from mail-in to streaming plans. Yet, because their streaming offerings are comparatively limited at this time, it presented a poisoned choice.

In the spirit of 21st century disclosure, I am among the hundreds of thousands of subscribers who left all or part of their Netflix subscriptions. Like so many others, my view of the company, which I had supported and admired for so long, was shaken.

Was it simply a price gouge? Was it necessary financing for a tech transition, simply poorly communicated? Did CEO Reed Hastings conclude Netflix could take longtime customers for granted? Was Netflix acting with presumed monopoly power, having vanquished its primary foes?

Here’s a smart take from John McKee in Tech Republic: Netflix CEO show us the fastest way to end a successful career.

Is McKee persuasive?

In the end, as so often, it comes down to leadership: Who Are They Serving? 

Did Netflix and Reed Hastings abandon their customers–or did their customers abandon them?

What do you think?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks:

  1. Servant Leadership Observer - October 2011 - November 10, 2011

    [...] To Lead: Netflix and Reed Hastings: Who Are They Serving? Last month, James Strock brought you a perspective on Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook’s lack of [...]